Now, with the world getting modernize every day, people have started to use the tools and gadgets of the 21st century to even manage their business schedules. Nomad and Kubernetes are types of these management tools offered by different companies. They both hold high ranks on the orchestration platforms.
Both the platforms are competitors to each other. People, if wanted, can choose either of them as another’s alternative. They both have similarities in scaling and deploying applications but, otherwise, do have certain features which make them different from each other. It is important to know the program’s functions before choosing the right option for one’s company.
Nomad vs Kubernetes
The main difference between Nomad and Kubernetes is that Nomad has fewer features to offer to customers in comparison to Kubernetes. Nomad only focuses on scheduling and management for clusters. Kubernetes, along with these functions, also provides users with service discovery, secret management, etc.
Nomad is a tool that can manage different types of applications. It is developed by HasiCorp and is also maintained by them as well. It is a scheduler as well as an orchestrator. It can run almost any application and can handle different series of workloads on its platform. It is best known for its scalability and simplicity.
Kubernetes is an orchestration network that helps the managing and deploying of applications. It runs on clusters, that is coordinating the clusters with nodes. It is the most well-known orchestration tool, and there are many reasons for that. One would be that it can do more functions than its competitors, and also, people trust it more since it was originally developed by Google.
Comparison Table Between Nomad and Kubernetes
| Parameters of Comparison | Nomad | Kubernetes |
| Definition | Nomad is a tool used by a person to manage and schedule their work. | Kubernetes is an orchestration tool that manages Docker containers. |
| Year of release | September 2015 | June 2014 |
| Another name | Nomad Hashicorp | Kube or k8s |
| Created by | HashiCorp | |
| Functions | Nomad has fewer features in comparison to Kubernetes. | Kubernetes has more features other than scaling and deploying applications that are offered by Nomad. |
What is Nomad?
Nomad can be defined as a container tool for applications on the web. One can manage and decide on their own on what cluster they want to connect where giving people a sense of ease. The updates on the platform are quite easy, and it also gives the user an upgrade guide to show them to follow the steps in an upgrade situation.
The architecture of the company is divided into three parts for a better understanding of the customers. The Nomad admins help in the Nomad servers to provide help to Nomad users. The company offers Nomad Workshop to certain countries where they can get knowledge about the system from Nomad’s engineers.
It is easy to navigate and get a hand on. The system is mostly used by my software companies and small to middle businesses. The company offers a free version of the site for customers. No third-party storage companies are used by the site, making the platform protective and light. Companies like Citadel, Trivago, and more use the software to manage their sites.
What is Kubernetes?
Kubernetes is a managing network. It is an open-source platform that can deploy, scald and manage containers on Linux. It is free to all and, thus, is a popular choice among people. It is more of an end-to-end container platform. It was earlier written in C++, but for the stable release, it was rewritten in the Go programming language.
The network was developed by Google, and its founders, Brendan Burns, Craig McLuckie, Joseph Beda, in 2014 but now is managed by Cloud Native Computing Foundation or CNCF. The platform is mostly used by big-scale enterprises that create transparency in their applications.
The platform is designed keeping in mind to hold the work of different workloads. Kubernetes does not offer either a free version or a free trial. The backend community is quite strong, and thus, the orchestration engine is smooth and robust. The main controlling unit of the cluster of the program is The Kubernetes master.
Main Differences Between Nomad and Kubernetes
- Nomad is considered simpler in comparison to Kubernetes. The interference of the former is less complex than the latter.
- The company behind Kubernetes is Google, but now it is maintained by Cloud Native Computing Foundation, while Nomad is developed and maintained by HashiCorp, a software company that has a variety of products other than Nomad.
- Kubernetes offers more services than Nomad. Extra features include service discovery, monitoring, and other additional features. It is also more powerful than Nomad.
- Nomad supports more number of applications in oppose to Kubernetes. Kubernetes mainly aims to help in Linux containers, while Nomad also focuses on Java, IIS on Windows, and other applications as well.
- It is seen that the time in error fixing on the Kubernetes platform is more than in comparison to the Nomad interference.
- Kubernetes is way more popular than Nomads currently. Kubernetes provides services to big cloud-based companies like Google, Shopify, and many others.
Conclusion
It depends on the user what they would like for themselves or their company as both Nomad and Kubernetes have their pros and cons, but one thing stands correct that companies now want their applications to be deployed. They both are open source software that has the feature to deploy and scale in the applications.
Now, when businesses are choosing their preferred way to record and manage their company tasks on the cloud. Interferences like these help these people to operate. If one wants a simple interference, they should choose Nomad as it is less complicated, the reason being it providing fewer services, but if they want more features, they should go to Kubernetes.
References
- https://www.usenix.org/conference/srecon17asia/program/presentation/campbell
- https://link.springer.com/chapter/10.1007/978-1-4842-4470-8_45