As the use of technology is increasing on daily basis, the crimes against these technologies are also increasing at the same rate. To be safe from these threats some extra protection is required in the digital world. After emerge of online shopping your bank details are even a part of the digital world which leads to many frauds. Thus, knowledge about firewalls and security is a must to gain.
Cisco FTD vs Palo Alto
The main difference between Cisco FTD and Palo Alto is based on the services they focus on or provide. Cisco FTD boosts the services like wireless switching or routing. It also includes firewalls whereas Palo alto mainly focuses on the services like either BGP or VPN which is also route based service.
Next-generation firewalls, such as Cisco Firepower, are a type of next-generation firewall. Cisco FTD is commonly known as Cisco firepower. Wireless switches, firewalls, and routers are all included, as well as other unique features. The Cisco Firepower interface is user-friendly and has all of the essential features. In terms of firewalls, Cisco Firepower is now rated ninth in the globe.
Palo Alto is a sort of NGFW. It includes a number of up-to-date security devices and administration connections. Palo Alto has a solid foundation. Palo Alto has been crowned the best firewall company in the world.BGP, VPN, and route-based services are all incredibly important features for networks. It’s an all-in-one solution.
Comparison Table Between Cisco FTD and Palo Alto
| Parameters of Comparison | Cisco FTD | Palo Alto |
| GUI | Cisco FTD is a firewall that is linked to a web-based GUI. | Palo Alto is not linked to a web-based GUI |
| Services | Cisco FTD provides boosted capabilities which include such as wireless switching, firewalls, and routing. | Palo Alto provides either BGP or VPN which is route-based. |
| Features | Cisco FTD mainly focuses on security. | Palo Alto pays attention to networking and integrated strategy with protection. |
| Affordability | Cisco FTD cost low as compared to Palo Alto | It costs high as compared to Cisco FTD. |
| Intelligence Unit | Talos intelligence unit | 42 intelligence unit |
What is Cisco FTD?
Cisco Firepower is a form of next-generation firewall. Wireless switching, firewall, routers, as well as other unique features are included. That Cisco Firepower’s interface is simple to use and provides all of the necessary functions. Cisco Firepower is currently ranked ninth in the world for firewalls.
Cisco Firepower successfully identifies & assists in the detection of Zero-day flaws that may be traversing a channel. It protects against infiltration and gives application awareness. ASA was the original name for Firepower. It missed several features that have since been included in the Firepower edition. The updated edition makes it easier to keep track of all inactive and active users.
Cisco Firepower shares many of the same capabilities as Fortinet FortiGate. These IPS & IDS elements are the most distinguishing qualities of Firepower. They aid in the assessment of any vulnerable flaws. It is possible to track all unauthorized users & estimate traffic. Inspection, URL filtering, and other security tools are also available. All hardware could be changed rapidly and without the need for a network outage.
Cisco Firepower has certain disadvantages as well. It’s doesn’t employ single consecutive pile computing and instead uses numerous modules to process information in a given time frame. At sometimes, management can be difficult. The CPU is depleted, yet performance can be increased. It also necessitates the closure of maintenance windows on occasion.
What is Palo Alto?
A type of NGFW is Palo Alto. It contains a lot of security devices and management connectors that are up to date. Palo Alto has a reliable platform. Palo Alto has been named first in the world for firewalls. BGP, VPN, & route-based services are all capabilities that are extremely useful for networks. It’s a comprehensive package.
Palo Alto aids in the efficient processing of a single flow of traffic. It aids in the improvement of each person’s reaction times as well as the network’s seamless operation. Auto Verdict is Alto Palo’s most distinctive characteristic, as it can distinguish every threat range. It sends out timely information to all subscribers who do have access in the event of a security breach.
The intellectual unit Unit 42 is present in the product. Throughout any information processing, it uses pilot pass processing & single sequential pile processing. The very same transmitted data is not used in numerous modules at the same time.
There are a few disadvantages as well. The procedure of setup and deployment, for example, is not straightforward. Palo Alto’s cloud-scale is significant in terms of product management. Client & service tech do not respond quickly or effectively. Reporting automation is relatively low. The services provided are rather costly, and they may not be suitable for all types of customers.
Main Differences Between Cisco FTD and Palo Alto
- These both are different on the basis of GUI. Palo Alto does not link to a web-based access GUI, although Cisco Firepower does.
- Cisco Firepower boasts certain unique capabilities, such as wireless switching, firewalls, and routing, whereas Palo Alto offers BGP or route-based VPN.
- Palo Alto focuses solely on security, while Cisco Firepower focuses on networking and integrated strategy with protection. The Cisco Firepower interface is user-friendly and has all of the essential features.
- Cisco Firepower is a low-cost service, whereas Palo Alto is a high-cost solution.
- Palo Alto has a Unit 42 intelligence unit, while Cisco Firepower has a Talos intelligence unit.
Conclusion
The threat engine on which both programs feed is a distinguishing feature. These goods are made by well-known companies offering exceptional customer service. Both these types of 3rd firewall software are prevalent. They are developed to increase the safety of your systems and thus, must to use. Which one of these is your call to make.
These services are sophisticated variants of standard firewalls. They include all of the basic network security measures. Both models have various characteristics and are available at different pricing. All parameters must be evaluated before making a final judgment on the product on all the parameters discussed above.
References
- https://www.rehab.research.va.gov/JOUR/00/37/6/pdf/burgar.pdf
- https://d1wqtxts1xzle7.cloudfront.net/24729403/rad-69-with-cover-page-v2.pdf?Expires=1641295472&Signature=BKVn2HHJ5GV5SN0lboPoNkOw4O93OhIKwzGcnKtiAJRPbXSEWrviiLoyNAllpp4DKilVv4OGJE1105AktPc6jGUNH-qmfYjruEbLtP61Awtz0qa~EYjdb1FrnFb7g-O3mVXRC7V1yFjBfrTScDRTRWK7WtoA6X3rJ6Xb7tWpO4-BzZo5GhkEUeVASw0D2UKtK5LpEweTGEOA6tiiTOKA0EzIqomjB3WtxELIpRc9-WXyUu0fphRNCmsUmF9JlmLrLBcKvpSa-ZfvU8YJI~ZluYkKANDm7qsd15eI3jXDLPPlUngFlsw5Y7oyAvpxYD~t9bdXegQG9~ZYVabtZTkfLg__&Key-Pair-Id=APKAJLOHF5GGSLRBV4ZA