Difference Between TQM and QMS (With Table)

Total Quality Management (TQM) originated in production, but due to its rising popularity, it has spread to practically every industry. TQM was primarily focused on enhancing procedures to achieve customer experience, frequently by implementing a loop of Planned, Execute, Verify, and Act (PDCA). People were frequently in charge of TQM instead of large enterprises.

An efficient quality management system (QMS) will be aligned with only a strategy for continuous monitoring and assessment, as well as a commitment to excellence. A QMS is typically applied throughout a firm, placing all processes in line with similar requirements and laws to provide quality and consistency at all stages.

Comparison Table Between TQM and QMS

What Is TQM?

TQM is a well-defined technique to increase organizational growth and innovation. It focuses on enhancing the value of organizational outputs, such as products and services while keeping the internal procedures in a process of continuous improvement. A whole quality management method views both corporate objectives and statutory obligations. Total quality management, which was initially designed for the manufacturing sector, has demonstrated its potential for various businesses. Nowadays, it includes medicine, life sciences, and other fields because it emphasizes long-term transformation.

The comprehensive quality management method is not just inappropriate for organizational-level procedures, but also department-level operations. A coordinated approach like this helps to ensure that the correct business is working toward the same goals, constantly enhancing the activities and processes in each area.

The TQM plan, on the other hand, would be hard to implement without a well-functioning QMS. It is accurate to say that the QMS is an important tool for guaranteeing comprehensive quality control in a company. “Total” emphasizes the need to improve processes in sectors other than manufacturing (for example, marketing and sales, finance and accounting, design and engineering); “management” emphasizes the need for managers to start managing excellence through financing, education, staff, and self-improvement. TQM attempts frequently rely heavily on pre-defined quality assurance tools and procedures, even though there is no universally acknowledged strategy. TQM was popular in the 1980s and early 1990s, but it was eventually surpassed by ISO 9000, Lean manufacturing, and Six Sigma.

What Is QMS?

The quality management system (QMS) is a set of business processes aimed at constantly meeting and exceeding customer expectations. It is in line with a company’s operations and objectives. It takes the shape of organizational dreams and ambitions, regulations, procedures, documented information, and the resources required to accomplish and maintain them. Early quality management emphasized the use of basic numbers and accidental selection to forecast the results of a raw material manufacturing line. Labor contributions were often the least expensive input in most industrialized cultures by the twentieth century. Therefore, attention switched to team interaction and dynamics, particularly early signaling of issues via a process of continuous improvement.

Since both shareholder and customer happiness and value perception have become more linked to these variables in the twenty-first century, QMS has evolved to merge with environmental and openness programs. The ISO 9000 series of requirements is the most widely used QMS system in the world; ISO 19011 auditing is important to achieve efficiency and sustainability, as well as their integration.

Other QMS are more concerned with long-term difficulties, assuming that methodical thought, transparency, and diagnostic rigor will mitigate other quality issues.

 Ken Croucher, a British consultant working on creating and implementing a unifying framework for a QMS inside the IT industry, coined the terms “Quality Management System” and “QMS” in 1991. 

Main Differences Between TQM and QMS

1. The TQM was developed by William Deming, a marketing consultant whose research used to have a considerable impact on Japanese enterprises, whereas the QMS approach was developed in 1991 by Ken Croucher, a British management consultant.
2. TQM strives to hold all engagement activities in the production process responsible for the ultimate product or service, whereas QMS aims to fulfill the demand of the consumer consistently.
3. In contrast, TQM doesn’t provide great leadership, whereas QMS provides great leadership.
4. TQM doesn’t place much emphasis on the idea that supplier relationships are mutually beneficial, whereas QMS understands that supplier relationships benefit both sides.
5. TQM consists of integrated business systems, but QMS does not have integrated business systems. 

Conclusion

A business or enterprise involves much more than merely purchasing and selling goods. Other factors such as loyalty, customer reviews, and service quality are also significant, and TQM and QMS are two ways that they are used. TQM, or Total Quality Management, is a method of assessing quality concerning internal company criteria. On the other hand, a QMS, or Quality Management System, is indeed a group of procedures, procedures, and tools created to ensure excellence and compliance with customer and regulatory criteria.

Everyone in the organization is accountable for ensuring quality in TQM and QMS by improving the product quality, service, procedures, policies, and workplace culture. 

References

1. https://journals.pan.pl/dlibra/show-content?id=106259
2. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1877042815014408